The reviewer’s view, before the review
Assessed the way a survey team would.
We assess trauma programs and perioperative services against the standards, and give you a written plan for what to fix and in what order.
What we assess
Designation and verification readiness.
Pursuing designation, preparing for a site survey, or closing findings from the last one: we bring the reviewer’s perspective to your program before the reviewers do.
On-site evaluation across the full continuum, delivered as a written gap analysis with a prioritized improvement roadmap.
A consultative review run against the verification process, with findings framed the way a survey team would frame them.
Policy and protocol development, activation criteria, transfer protocols, performance improvement, registry optimization, and staff education.
PIPS program design, case review structure, loop closure documentation, and reporting built to hold up at survey.
Registry stand-up, data quality assessment, benchmarking, and the clean data most first-time applications require.
Ongoing monthly access for programs that want continuity between site visits.
What we review
Coverage models and call structure.
Built on what we know first-hand: how perioperative and anesthesia coverage is structured, what it costs, and whether the model fits your case volume and your community.
- 01.
Staffing model
Surgical and anesthesia staffing evaluated against case mix and volume.
- 02.
Call panel
Call structure, backup coverage, and burden distribution.
- 03.
Anesthesia coverage
Coverage model and subsidy review.
- 04.
Credentialing
Credentialing and privileging process assessment.
- 05.
Coverage mix
Locum, permanent, and hybrid coverage analysis.
- 06.
Service lines
Restoration and expansion planning.
How an engagement runs
Phased, and scoped before it starts.
Engagements are scoped and priced to the facility. Workshops and verification readiness programs also run on their own, in one- and two-day formats.
Assessment
On-site evaluation and stakeholder interviews, delivered as a written report with a gap analysis and a prioritized roadmap.
On siteImplementation
A return engagement to convert recommendations into policy, protocol, program structure, and training.
Return visitReassessment
Follow-up review at six to twelve months to confirm changes held and identify what remains.
Six to twelve monthsRetained advisory
Ongoing monthly access to maintain momentum between visits and build internal capability.
Monthly
If you have a program to assess
See it before the surveyors do.
A written report, and the plan to close what it finds.